AN APPRASIAL OF THE GUIDELINES ON ROAD DESIGN PAVEMENTS
Abstract
Procedures to perform structural design of pavements are detailed in various design guidelines. Even though the recommendations may be different across the different guidelines, some of the underlying principles are similar. The present paper briefly reviews various pavement design guidelines on structural design of asphalt pavements with reference to the design principles employed. The focus is primarily kept on the mechanistic–empirical pavement design approach. The discussion covers few specific aspects of asphalt pavement design, and does not intend to present an exhaustive treatise on the subject.
Introduction
An asphalt pavement is made up of multiple layers, namely subgrade, sub-base, base, surfacing and wearing course. While there are design considerations involved in a pavement from the geometric, functional and drainage aspects, the structural design indicates estimation of appropriate thicknesses of the pavement layers.
Different kinds of materials are used to construct individual layers of a pavement structure. These materials show complex response when subjected to load, temperature and moisture variations. The engineering properties of a pavement material depends on the relative composition of its constituents. The composition of a pavement material is finalized through appropriate mix design, so that the desirable levels of various engineering properties of the material are achieved. However, sometimes a pair of desirable properties may show conflicting trends with the variation of a constituent of the mix. For example, with the increase of the asphalt binder content in the asphalt mix, the fatigue performance may improve, but the stiffness modulus value may start decreasing. From pavement design stand-point, both (i) good fatigue performance, as well as (ii) high stiffness modulus of the asphalt mix, are desirable. Thus, appropriate (i) choice of pavement material for the individual pavement layers, (ii) mix design for each of these materials and (iii) estimation of engineering properties (which are used as design input), are integral parts of the process of pavement design [1–16].
Environmental parameters used in pavement design primarily include variation of temperature and moisture conditions (including freezing and thawing situations) during the service period of the pavement. In the design guidelines such variations are accounted either (i) considering expected/equilibrium value of the temperature and the moisture content during the design period [4, 8, 10, 16] or, (ii) by dividing the total design period into certain time intervals and considering the effects of temperature and moisture content (in terms of incremental damage) for these time intervals [1, 15]. For design purpose, it is generally assumed that the temperature affects the stiffness of the asphalt layer and the moisture content affects the stiffness of the unbound granular layer and the subgrade. Further, it may be noted that there always exists a temperature profile and moisture content profile (that is, variation along the depth of the pavement). For design purpose, a representative values of temperature and moisture content are chosen which carry the equivalent effects of such variations along the depth [17, 18].
Traffic parameters involve considerations of traffic volume, axle load spectrum, tyre contact pressure, wheel and axle configuration, lateral wander of wheel path, traffic growth rate etc. Guidelines suggest various empirical factors or, computational approaches to take into account of these parameters so as to convert the estimated cumulative traffic volume (within the design period) to equivalent number of standard axle load repetitions [2–5, 8–10, 12, 16, 19, 20]. Sometimes, the damage caused by individual axle load groups are estimated separately.
The next section discusses the basic principles of asphalt pavement design and how different guidelines employ these principles to evolve respective design recommendations.
Principles of Asphalt Pavement Design
Different methods of pavement design are proposed at different points of time, for example, CBR-thickness approach, limiting deflection approach, bearing capacity approach, equivalent granular thickness approach and so on [13, 14, 21–23].
In AASHTO 1993 method [19], the pavement is designed based on an index which represents the overall strength of the pavement structure. This index is a function of the composition of individual layers and their thicknesses [19]. Some pavement design guidelines recommend use of AASHTO 1993 [19] method in conjunction with other local recommendations [2, 5, 24, 25]. In some guidelines, pavement deign recommendations are provided in template/tabular forms. These templates are either based on prior experience on the performance of pavements or prior design calculations [6, 10, 26–29].
The principles of mechanistic-empirical pavement design approach (initially known as analytical pavement design) evolved during 1960s [14, 21, 30, 31]. A number of guidelines at present follow mechanistic-empirical approach for design of asphalt pavements [1, 3, 4, 7, 8, 12, 14, 16, 20, 32–35].
Figure 1 presents a simplified thought process involved in the design of asphalt pavement using mechanistic-empirical method. Elaborate flow-charts are available in the literature [13, 14, 22, 36] and in various guidelines [1, 4, 6, 15, 16, 20, 37, 38]. In this approach, trial thicknesses of the pavement layers are assumed and the critical stress/strain values (typically strain is considered for design of asphalt pavements) at the critical locations are computed by structural analysis of the pavement. The computed strain values are compared with the allowable values and the design thicknesses are finalized through iterations. This process is repeated for all the types of structural distresses which are dependent on the layer thicknesses.
The concept of estimation of allowable strain is further illustrated in Fig. 2. The upper part of Fig. 2 schematically shows that the structural distress increases (possibly with increasing rate as shown in the diagram) with the increase of number of repetitions (the repetitions can be traffic load repetitions or environmental cycles). For different pavement structures (that is, pavements with different thicknesses, shown as 1, 2 and 3 in Fig. 2), a same level of distress would occur at different number of repetitions. That is, considering distress level ‘p’ as the failure distress level (for a given type of structural distress being considered in the design) the pavement structure 3 would have more longevity than the pavement structure 2, and the pavement structure 2 would have more longevity than the pavement structure 1. The lower part of Fig. 2 shows that for a given initial critical strain (when the pavement is built for the first time and the first load is applied), the pavement can sustain a given number of repetitions till failure, when distress level ‘p’ is defined as structural failure. For a pavement design problem, this initial strain is treated as the allowable strain.
Design of Overlay and Subsequent Overlays
A pavement gradually deteriorates due to its exposure to environment and traffic. Overlaying is one of the maintenance measures, where additional asphalt layer thickness is provided to the existing pavement. Limiting deflection [9, 64–66], equivalent thickness [19, 64, 65], and mechanistic–empirical method [15, 63] are the different approaches for design of overlay thickness.
The mechanistic–empirical overlay design principle can be explained in the following manner. Consider any design point (say ‘D’) on the pavement design curve presented in Fig. 3. The corresponding asphalt and granular layer thicknesses are, therefore, DF and EF respectively. After serving the design period of DT 1 (say), the asphalt layer deteriorates resulting in reduction of stiffness. In a conservative sense, one may consider that the stiffness of the deteriorated asphalt layer is equivalent to that of the granular layer. In that case, the asphalt overlay can be designed considering the total existing granular layer thickness as EG (as shown schematically in Fig. 3) and the same design chart can be utilized. However, due to possibilities of reflection cracking, the transfer functions for overlay design may be different than those of used for design of pavement for the first time.
Further, the stiffness modulus value of the deteriorated asphalt layer may not be as low as a granular layer. Thus, for estimation of the in situ stiffness values (for all the individual layers) at any given point of time, suitable nondestructive testing method, for example, falling weight deflectometer (FWD) can be adopted [15, 19, 67, 68].
Planned staged construction of asphalt layer is a situation when the asphalt layer is constructed in stages [3, 4]. The possible reasons for adopting planned staged construction can be identified as (i) budgetary restrictions, (ii) uncertainty in the traffic prediction, (iii) unfavourable weather condition for continuing construction etc. [4]. If the time gap between construction of two consecutive asphalt layers is small, (i) deterioration of the asphalt layer (provided in the first stage) can be assumed to be negligible, or, (ii) some deterioration can be assumed corresponding to the time already passed, and the thickness for the asphalt layer for the second stage can be estimated (following the principle illustrated in Fig. 1) [3, 4].
A pavement design problem (for new pavement as well as overlay), for a given set of input parameters, is expected to have multiple design solutions. Economic analysis is generally used to choose the best design [2, 4, 15, 19, 20, 69]. Further, a pavement in its entire service period may undergo many rounds of rehabilitation and maintenance activities. Planning (at the initial design stage) for appropriate maintenance measures and their application timings for a given road stretch (or for a road network) is an interesting but complex problem [70].
Closure
A vast literature is available on asphalt pavement design. Each region, or country or, state or, even a county may be following a particular pavement design guidelines, somewhat different than the rest others. The input parameters, the design equations, and the design recommendations provided in these guidelines may vary widely. Hence, the final design thickness values, across different guidelines (for the same set of design input), may even be found to be different [16, 37, 71–73]. The present brief paper highlights that the basic principles of mechanistic–empirical pavement design adopted across various guidelines, are, however, similar.
Pavement design involves consideration of repetitions of load (traffic repetitions and environmental cycles). Thus, it is important to be able to predict the propagation of damage of an in-service pavement with the progression of repetitions [74–76]. But, given the complexities with the material behaviour, structure and the loading pattern, developing a comprehensive theoretical model is still a complex task. Thus, for design purpose, equations empirically relating the initial strain (or stress) values (generally due to static loading) to the number of repetitions till failure observed in the field, are used. The form of these equations across different guidelines may be different, and even if the form is similar, the calibration constants may vary widely [9, 15, 17, 20, 36, 42–48].
Further, Miner’s postulation [77] is generally used for estimation of cumulative damage in the pavement due to load repetitions [1, 3, 7, 9, 15, 18, 20, 33, 36, 37, 58]. This assumes damage caused by different loads applied at different points of time are linearly additive. Considering the complex response of the pavement materials (which are dependent on time, stress level, and considering the healing phenomenon observed in asphalt mix) there is possibly a need to explore other models for calculation of cumulative damage [50, 78].
The mechanistic–empirical pavement design approach followed in various pavement design guidelines still has significant portion of empirical content. It is envisaged that rigorous theoretical research in conjunction with laboratory and field observations would eventually lead to a more mechanistic approach of pavement design.
References
- 1.American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials (2008) AASHTO mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide: a manual of practice, interim edition. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington,
